|
THE
USES OF DEMOGRAPHIC
DATA
Introduction
Some
specific uses of demographic
data for NMCPs include
estimating the population
at risk of malaria, determining
population distribution
and migration patterns,
calculating population
growth rates and estimating
malaria mortality.
- The
population at risk
of malaria
Risk
groups with low immunity
to malaria may be
the result of age
(under-five year olds),
pregnancy and migration.
The size of these
risk groups can be
estimated using demographic
data.
- Population
distribution and density
Demographic
data can be used to
document the spatial
distribution of a
population at a variety
of subnational scales
from the provincial
and district levels
down to the ward and
sub-ward levels. A
proper understanding
of the distribution
of population within
countries can help
MCPs target
resources effectively.
The
movement of people
can have a major impact
on malarias mission.
For example, non-
or low-immune migrants
moving to malaria-endemic
areas can cause a
sharp upturn in malaria
mortality. Equally,
migrants can bring
in drug-resistant
strains of malaria
into previously unaffected
areas. Changes in
population density
due to migration can
lead to changes in
the ecology of areas
that can increase
mosquito breeding
sites. For example,
dam building in rapidly
growing rural areas
and development of
peri-urban areas and
urban agriculture
in towns and cities.
MCPs need to understand
where major population
movements are occurring
and their composition
(e.g. age of migrants)
and nature (e.g. permanent,
forced, temporary,
circular).
Demographic
data provides information
on how quickly populations
are growing. Medium-to-high
birth rates in SAMC
countries mean population
growth rates range
between 2 and 3% per
annum. MCPs need to
appreciate the population
they serve is growing
and at different rates
within their country
(due to differences
in mortality, fertility
and, especially, migration).
Knowing
the contribution of
malaria to mortality
is vital in order
to evaluate the impact
MCPs have on malaria
control. The quality
and quantity of cause-specific
mortality data ranges
from poor to moderate
in most SAMC countries.
Consequently, there
are many problems
in estimating malaria
mortality from existing
data. Whenever malaria
mortality estimates
are calculated the
methodology used should
be clearly stated
and the limitations
of the data acknowledged.
Back to top
DATA
QUALITY AND AVAILABILITY
The
quality and availability
of demographic data
vary considerably within
the SAMC programme area.
It is important to determine
how rates or totals
are calculated and for
what period. As censuses
are taken every 10 years,
census data quickly
become out-of-date.
Often Central Statistical
Offices (CSOs) provide
population projections
for the 10 year period
between censuses. However,
these projections are
based on assumptions
that may not reflect
the true situation.
For example, the assumption
made by many CSOs that
mortality rates would
continue to fall has
been violated by the
impact of HIV on mortality.
Equally, projections
for small areas within
countries (the district
level and below) are
liable to have a wide
margin of error.
Within
the SAMC programme area
the main sources of
demographic data are
censuses, Demographic
and Health Surveys (DHS),
and vital registration
systems.
Back to top
MORTALITY
WITHIN SOUTHERN AFRICA
Mortality
levels within SAMC countries
have risen markedly
in the last decade.
This is primarily due
to high HIV prevalence
levels. Estimating the
precise impact of HIV
on mortality is very
difficult and is reflected
in the wide range mortality
estimates available
for SAMC countries.

Table
3.1. Estimates of the
crude death rate (1996),
infant mortality (1996),
under-five mortality
(1995-2000) (WHO, 1998)
and maternal mortality
(1990) (UNICEF, 1998).
| SAMC
Country
|
Crude
death rate (per
1000 population) |
Infant
mortality rate (per
1000 live births) |
Under-five
mortality rate (per
1000 live births) |
Maternal
mortality rate (per
100,000 births) |
| Angola |
18.7 |
125 |
191 |
1500 |
| Botswana |
13.3 |
56 |
94 |
250 |
| Malawi |
22.4 |
142 |
222 |
560 |
| Mozambique |
17.4 |
110 |
162 |
1500 |
| Namibia |
11.9 |
60 |
98 |
370 |
| South
Africa |
7.8 |
47 |
68 |
230 |
| Swaziland |
9.1 |
64 |
94 |
560 |
| Tanzania |
13.5 |
80 |
123 |
770 |
| Zambia |
18.0 |
103 |
150 |
940 |
| Zimbabwe |
14.7 |
68 |
107 |
570 |
The
contribution of malaria
to mortality varies
considerably between
SAMC countries because
of differences in malaria
endemicity, prevention
and treatment as well
as differences in the
incidence of other infectious
diseases (e.g. HIV),
health service provision
and socio-economic conditions.
However, even in countries
where malaria is confined
to limited areas of
the country, malaria
mortality can be high
among vulnerable groups,
particularly in epidemic
years. For example,
in 1996 the malaria
epidemic in Zimbabwe
meant malaria was the
leading cause of maternal
mortality being responsible
for 40% of maternal
deaths.
Back to top
PLANNING
FOR MALARIA CONTROL
IN THE SAMC AREA
The
estimated total population
of SAMC countries in
1998 was 142m (see
Table 4.1). The
population of SAMC countries
varies considerably:
South Africa and Tanzania
make up over 50% of
the SAMC population
while Botswana, Namibia
and Swaziland make up
only 3%. Equally, population
density varies widely
within the SAMC region
ranging from 2.0 in
Namibia to 87.6 people
per km2 in
Malawi.
Table
4.1. Total population
and population density
of SAMC countries, 1998
(UN 1995; WHO 1998;
INE 1999).
| SAMC
Country
|
Estimated
population, 1998 |
%
of total SAMC population |
Population
density
(per
km2)
|
Year
of last census |
Population
at last census |
| Angola |
11,967,000 |
8.6 |
9.6 |
1970 |
5,646,000 |
| Botswana |
1,553,000 |
1.1 |
2.7 |
1991 |
1,402,000 |
| Malawi |
10,376,000 |
7.4 |
87.6 |
1987 |
7,983,000 |
| Mozambique |
16,118,000 |
11.5 |
20.3 |
1997 |
15,700,000 |
| Namibia |
1,656,000 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
1991 |
1,327,000 |
| South
Africa |
44,296,000 |
31.7 |
36.3 |
1996 |
38,000,000 |
| Swaziland |
932,000 |
0.7 |
53.5 |
1986 |
681,000 |
| Tanzania |
32,190,000 |
23.0 |
34.1 |
1988 |
23,100,000 |
| Zambia |
8,691,000 |
6.2 |
11.6 |
1990 |
7,820,000 |
| Zimbabwe |
11,926,000 |
8.5 |
30.5 |
1992 |
10,413,000 |
| SAMC
population |
139,705,000 |
100.0 |
20.2 |
|
|
The
SAMC countries have
relatively young populations
(Table
4.2). However, age
distribution does vary
between countries (Figure
4.1) with the percentage
of the population under
16 years ranging from
37% (South Africa) to
48% (Angola) and for
under-fives from 13%
(South Africa) to 20%
(Angola).
Back to top
Table
4.2. Estimated population
by age-group and by
country, 1998 (WHO 1998,
SAMC estimate for Mozambique)
| SAMC
Country
|
<1
year |
1-4
years |
5-14
years |
15+
years |
Total
population |
| Angola |
516,000 |
1,781,000 |
3,404,000 |
6,266,000 |
11,967,000 |
| Botswana |
51,000 |
192,000 |
418,000 |
892,000 |
1,553,000 |
| Malawi |
445,000 |
1,488,000 |
2,909,000 |
5,534,000 |
10,376,000 |
| Mozambique |
628,000 |
2,208,000 |
4,384,000 |
8,897,000 |
16,118,000 |
| Namibia |
56,000 |
205,000 |
432,000 |
963,000 |
1,656,000 |
| South
Africa |
1,253,000 |
4,690,000 |
10,283,000 |
28,070,000 |
44,296,000 |
| Swaziland |
32,000 |
118,000 |
242,000 |
540,000 |
932,000 |
| Tanzania |
1,238,000 |
4,412,000 |
8,989,000 |
17,551,000 |
32,190,000 |
| Zambia |
340,000 |
1,196,000 |
2,555,000 |
4,600,000 |
8,691,000 |
| Zimbabwe |
415,000 |
1,560,000 |
3,271,000 |
6,680,000 |
11,926,000 |
| SAMC
population |
4,974,000 |
17,850,000 |
36,887,000 |
79,993,000 |
139,705,000 |
Back to top

The
population that is at
greatest risk of malaria
consists of those with
low or no immunity to
malaria. In non-endemic
areas, all age groups
are at risk of malaria.
However, in endemic
areas under-five year
olds and pregnant women
form the two main risk
groups due to their
low immunity to malaria.
Within the SAMC area
there are approximately
23 million children
under-five years of
age (see
Table 4.2).
The
estimated total number
of births per year can
be used as a proxy for
the number of pregnant
women per year
(see Table 4.3).
Back to top
Table
4.3. Estimated number
of women aged 15-49
years, estimated crude
birth rate and estimated
number of births for
SAMC countries, 1998
(WHO 1998, SAMC estimate
for Mozambique)
| SAMC
Country
|
Women
aged 15-49 years |
%
of total population |
Crude
birth rate |
Estimated
births |
| Angola |
2,606,000 |
7.9 |
47.4 |
568,000 |
| Botswana |
383,000 |
1.2 |
34.8 |
54,000 |
| Malawi |
2,341,000 |
7.1 |
47.5 |
493,000 |
| Mozambique |
3,658,000 |
11.1 |
42.3 |
682,000 |
| Namibia |
387,000 |
1.2 |
35.8 |
59,000 |
| South
Africa |
11,113,000 |
33.6 |
29.6 |
1,311,000 |
| Swaziland |
242,000 |
0.7 |
36.7 |
34,000 |
| Tanzania |
7,450,000 |
22.5 |
41.1 |
1,324,000 |
| Zambia |
2,035,000 |
6.1 |
42.4 |
368,000 |
| Zimbabwe |
2,879,000 |
8.7 |
36.8 |
438,000 |
| SAMC
population |
33,094,000 |
100.0 |
N/A |
5,331,000 |
Table
4.4. Percentage of the
population living in
malarious areas and
the number of under-fives
and pregnant women at
risk of malaria for
SAMC countries.
| SAMC
Country
|
%
of population living
in malarious areas |
Total
population living
in malarious areas |
Number
of <5 year olds
at risk of malaria |
Number
of pregnant women
at risk of malaria |
| Angola |
100 |
11967000 |
2297000 |
568000 |
| Botswana |
40 |
620400 |
97200 |
21600 |
| Malawi |
100 |
10377000 |
1933000 |
493000 |
| Mozambique |
100 |
16118000 |
2836000 |
682000 |
| Namibia |
66 |
1090980 |
172260 |
38940 |
| South
Africa |
10 |
4429500 |
594300 |
131100 |
| Swaziland |
30 |
279300 |
45000 |
10200 |
| Tanzania |
90 |
28970100 |
5085000 |
1191600 |
| Zambia |
100 |
8690000 |
1536000 |
368000 |
| Zimbabwe |
50 |
5962000 |
987500 |
219000 |
| SAMC
population |
68 |
88504280 |
15583260 |
3723440 |
Table
4.5. Population and
urban growth rates per
annum and % of population
living in urban areas
by SAMC country (UNICEF,
1998)
| SAMC
Country
|
Population
growth rate
(%) (1980-96) |
Urban
growth rate
(%) (1980-96) |
%
of population
living in urban
areas (1996) |
| Angola |
2.9 |
5.5 |
32 |
| Botswana |
3.1 |
12.0 |
63 |
| Malawi |
2.9 |
5.6 |
14 |
| Mozambique |
2.4 |
8.6 |
35 |
| Namibia |
2.7 |
5.7 |
37 |
| South
Africa |
2.3 |
2.5 |
50 |
| Swaziland |
2.8 |
6.5 |
32 |
| Tanzania |
3.2 |
6.5 |
25 |
| Zambia |
2.3 |
2.8 |
43 |
| Zimbabwe |
3.0 |
5.3 |
33 |
|